Geoffrey W. Cope

Uncategorized

Inventor

Rate now

  [ 3.30 ] – good Voters 2   Comments 2

Details

Inventor

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for Canadian inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Geoffrey W. Cope has received 2 rating(s) and 2 review(s), resulting in an average rating of 3.30 on a scale from 1 to 5. The overall rating for this inventor is good.

If you have personal experience with Geoffrey W. Cope, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Geoffrey W. Cope will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Vikash

As few as ten years ago, custom nlrerafceework.nets had been those rare few who strayed from the 9-5 life to make a living working from home. We watched them from our office windows as they strolled by wearing jeans while we had been clad in suits and ties. Whereas we had been trapped inside eating lunch at our desks on those nice spring days, custom nlrerafceework.nets had been enjoying a long informal meal at an outside cafe. We assumed they struggled to seek out work, but we still envied them. They appeared so free. They had been residing their lives, whereas we have been stuck inside office buildings working for bosses we could not stand just so we might stay paycheck to paycheck. Fast-ahead to in the present day, and all the things has changed. Now, plenty of us are freelancing. Why? custom freelancer jobs employment is the future.

Was this review helpful to you?

Can the public trust this person/organization?
What is the main driving force for this inventor/examiner/corporation/other?
Do you think that the work of this person/organization is useful for the community?
Do you think you would do his/her/its job better?
Rate how useful are patents this person/organization has invented/approved.
Would you give a formal recognition to this person/organization for its patent related work?

0     0    


Ali

that, permit me rveeal to you just what exactly did deliver the results. Your authoring is definitely incredibly powerful and this is probably the reason why I am taking the effort in order to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, although I can easily notice a jumps in logic you come up with, I am definitely not convinced of how you appear to connect your points that make the actual conclusion. For the moment I shall subscribe to your position however wish in the future you link your facts much better.

Was this review helpful to you?

Can the public trust this person/organization?
What is the main driving force for this inventor/examiner/corporation/other?
Do you think that the work of this person/organization is useful for the community?
Do you think you would do his/her/its job better?
Rate how useful are patents this person/organization has invented/approved.
Would you give a formal recognition to this person/organization for its patent related work?

0     0    


     

Profile ID: LFCA-PAI-P-63247

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.